Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email


News: - Make sure you know the Forum Rules and Guidelines

Also check out these related sites:

Author Topic: New record label?  (Read 3594 times)

Offlinevancip

  • Local Hero
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • Registered: October 2011
New record label?
« on: July 17, 2014, 01:31:19 PM »
Edit: Universal bought EMI Virgin and merged it with Mercury label

http://www.virginemirecords.com/mark-knopfler/
« Last Edit: July 17, 2014, 01:35:47 PM by vancip »

Offlinevgonis

  • Juliet
  • ******
  • They waited for an hour and then nothing happened
  • Posts: 2559
  • Location: athens, greece
  • Registered: January 2010
    • greece in dire straits, life in greece
Re: New record label?
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2014, 12:37:11 PM »
I don't get where this monopoly will lead us. Now there are only 3 major labels, Sony/BMG, Universal and WB, amassing around 85% of the world's music business/copyrights/recordings...
Come on, it is not funny anymore.

Offlinedustyvalentino

  • Not Quite The Movie Star
  • Founder
  • THE Sultan of Swing
  • *********
  • Posts: 6599
  • Location: Donkeytown
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: New record label?
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2014, 02:54:13 PM »
Let's face facts, you don't need a record label anymore.
"You can't polish a doo-doo" - Mark Knopfler

Offlinevgonis

  • Juliet
  • ******
  • They waited for an hour and then nothing happened
  • Posts: 2559
  • Location: athens, greece
  • Registered: January 2010
    • greece in dire straits, life in greece
Re: New record label?
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2014, 04:12:32 PM »
I believe that there are several aspects of the monopoly of the record business. One is that a record label with all the tools it has can turn the spotlight on you in a second, while doing it on your own through the internet is a task that takes lots of luck regardless of value and talent. And since the monopoly dictates the rules only a handful of artists (usually the multi million sellers)  can live of off their music, recorded or live (merchandise included) .The second is how music which is a form of art, an  expression of beauty, is enslaved by people that only have profit as their only concern, ending up destroying music and artists, framing their own customers and charging expensive for half baked desires. The  labels, where artist is treated as a person and not a cash machine is in fact much needed for providing the artist with more time by taking care of the marketing part of the music business.  But the independent labels are really run down by force , by the big 3. Let's see where it lead us.
Come on, it is not funny anymore.

Offlineds1984

  • Rüdiger
  • *******
  • Used to be...
  • Posts: 3736
  • Registered: February 2009
Re: New record label?
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2014, 05:59:19 PM »
Let's face facts, you don't need a record label anymore.

Some artists that were used with a label tried to make without them and went back to the label system.

You have to be a superstar to be able to do without the label system but for 99.9 % of case you need them.

And even for the remaining 0.1 % most of the time they sign a deal with a major company to be distributed by them - this include big act such as The Rolling Stones or Led Zeppelin...

The haters are those who write shit

Two weeks in Australia and Sydney striptease

Offlinedmg

  • David Knopfler
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9251
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • Registered: August 2009
Re: New record label?
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2014, 08:37:16 PM »
Guy Fletcher doesn't have a label and with all respect (if any is actually required) he isn't a "superstar."  In saying that, I don't know anything about his record sales but given that he hand signs copies they can't be in the millions!  I suppose it depends on the name, marketing and a few other things as well.  :-\
"I'm playing all the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order."

LoveExpresso

  • Guest
Re: New record label?
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2014, 11:03:50 AM »
The way Guy Fletcher "distributed" his albums can hardly be seen as professional, in fact it is the most unprofessional way one could think of... It looks more like a hobby... suddenly, when I saw this, I believed that they indeed could not care for money at all (like they always say)... it was great for us to have a personally shipped and signed copy in posh envelopes, but i guess none of his albums might have sold more than a few hundreds... With his famous name and the connections he must have and the possibilities, it is quite astonishing that he did it this way.

LE

Offlinedmg

  • David Knopfler
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9251
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • Registered: August 2009
Re: New record label?
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2014, 11:43:28 AM »
The way Guy Fletcher "distributed" his albums can hardly be seen as professional, in fact it is the most unprofessional way one could think of... It looks more like a hobby... suddenly, when I saw this, I believed that they indeed could not care for money at all (like they always say)... it was great for us to have a personally shipped and signed copy in posh envelopes, but i guess none of his albums might have sold more than a few hundreds... With his famous name and the connections he must have and the possibilities, it is quite astonishing that he did it this way.

LE

It's a good point you make in that he (Guy) must have made a lot of connections in the industry over the years and yet chose to distribute his albums this manner.  Did he burn them on his MacBook Pro?   :think 

Perhaps with the huge percentage the label takes he resented it, especially for the small number he thought he would sell.
"I'm playing all the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order."

LoveExpresso

  • Guest
Re: New record label?
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2014, 11:53:08 AM »
It seems he's a real independent artist!

LE

Offlinedmg

  • David Knopfler
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9251
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • Registered: August 2009
Re: New record label?
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2014, 02:22:53 PM »
It seems he's a real independent artist!

LE

Yeah, didn't he design his own cover art too?
"I'm playing all the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order."

Offlinesuperval99

  • Erwin Knopfler
  • **********
  • Posts: 7547
  • Location: UK
  • Registered: August 2008
Re: New record label?
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2014, 02:31:48 PM »
It seems he's a real independent artist!

LE

Yeah, didn't he design his own cover art too?

Well, didn't you know that he can turn his hand to anything!    ;D
Goin' into Tow Law....

Offlinewayaman

  • Camerado
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
  • Registered: March 2014
Re: New record label?
« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2014, 03:35:38 PM »
John Illsley released his two first records with Vertigo (as DS) and nowadays he does it with his own label. In fact he re-released that firsts records on his label as well

Offlinedmg

  • David Knopfler
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9251
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • Registered: August 2009
Re: New record label?
« Reply #12 on: July 21, 2014, 06:41:10 PM »
It seems he's a real independent artist!

LE

Yeah, didn't he design his own cover art too?

Well, didn't you know that he can turn his hand to anything!    ;D

 :smack
"I'm playing all the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order."

Offlinevgonis

  • Juliet
  • ******
  • They waited for an hour and then nothing happened
  • Posts: 2559
  • Location: athens, greece
  • Registered: January 2010
    • greece in dire straits, life in greece
Re: New record label?
« Reply #13 on: July 22, 2014, 03:45:49 PM »
I miss the personal touch of the indie labels.
Come on, it is not funny anymore.

 

© 2024 amarkintime.org
This is an unofficial website dedicated to Mark Knopfler developed and maintained by fans.
Top banner design by Dutchessy.
This theme is based on the SMF theme Carbonate by Bloc.
SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Page created in 0.037 seconds with 40 queries.