A Mark In Time
Mark Knopfler Discussion => Mark Knopfler Discussion Forum => Topic started by: knopfling on March 11, 2014, 11:40:35 PM
-
http://www.saratogian.com/arts-and-entertainment/20140311/the-straits-to-perform-at-the-palace-in-albany
By Don Wilcock, 518entertainment@ 21st-centurymedia.com
POSTED: 03/11/14, 4:12 PM EDT |
ALBANY >> Two former members of Dire Straits have formed a band they
-
I wonder why this guy on the picture holds his index finger, it should be middle!
-
THE email part was interesting
-
Interesting article. Nice to see that at least some media reflect in a little more deliberate and differentiated way on the issue.
-
THE email part was interesting
Yes. So Mark okayed the charity gig but if only he knew just what that little acorn would grow into. :smack
-
I am so sorry people but I genuinely don't think that Reis sounds anything like Knopfler, especially in the vocal department. Regarding his guitar playing he is great but he is like every other person who plays Knopfler songs, it sounds great for the most part but seriously is not up there to Knopfler levels.
MK was the creator whilst all other tribute artists are and always will be just imitators.
Just my opinion folks but no tribute artist has ever really come close to Knopfler's tone, creativity or natural live performance.
Bringing something new? errrr no, it's called a tribute and it is in my opinion just that, a tribute in the style of Reis.
-
Of course tribute artists are imitators - that's the whole point!
No one will ever play Knopfler as well as Knopfler - even if they were a "better" guitarist than him. Any player's style is their own, you can come close but not perfect.
To me, a good tribute player should be able to recreate the sound and feel accurately and also be able to add their own touches without ever straying too far from the original style. In other words, if they improvise you want it sound like it could have been Knopfler improvising.
Don't know enough of Reis's playing to know if he does this. But I wouldn't expect to see a tribute artist sounding 100% like the original - not unless they were so obsessed with it that they has never developed a style of their own, in which case they are an impressionist not a musician and I'd have no interest in seeing that.
-
Well, I am looking forward to seeing them in about 2 weeks. :)
-
Of course tribute artists are imitators - that's the whole point!
No one will ever play Knopfler as well as Knopfler - even if they were a "better" guitarist than him. Any player's style is their own, you can come close but not perfect.
To me, a good tribute player should be able to recreate the sound and feel accurately and also be able to add their own touches without ever straying too far from the original style. In other words, if they improvise you want it sound like it could have been Knopfler improvising.
Don't know enough of Reis's playing to know if he does this. But I wouldn't expect to see a tribute artist sounding 100% like the original - not unless they were so obsessed with it that they has never developed a style of their own, in which case they are an impressionist not a musician and I'd have no interest in seeing that.
I was mainly making a point that it gets on my nerves how Clark in particular insists on making out that Knopfler is of no importance.. (done with quite clever wording imo)
Just my opinion :)
-
Of course tribute artists are imitators - that's the whole point!
No one will ever play Knopfler as well as Knopfler - even if they were a "better" guitarist than him. Any player's style is their own, you can come close but not perfect.
To me, a good tribute player should be able to recreate the sound and feel accurately and also be able to add their own touches without ever straying too far from the original style. In other words, if they improvise you want it sound like it could have been Knopfler improvising.
Don't know enough of Reis's playing to know if he does this. But I wouldn't expect to see a tribute artist sounding 100% like the original - not unless they were so obsessed with it that they has never developed a style of their own, in which case they are an impressionist not a musician and I'd have no interest in seeing that.
I was mainly making a point that it gets on my nerves how Clark in particular insists on making out that Knopfler is of no importance.. (done with quite clever wording imo)
Just my opinion :)
Regardless of my opinions I genuinely hope you have a great time :)
-
From the end of the article:
"So, will Knopfler sue?