Actually TOL was not dropped early. You get this impression because all soundboard recordings from the OES tour (Nimes, Basel, Wobburn Abbey,...) happen to be "TR" kind of concerts; but TOL and TR were sharing a slot and played alternatively, about 50% each. Well, it was more like 60/40 is favour of TOL in 1991, and the reverse in 1992. But TOL was played right to the end in the last concerts in Spain.
OTN is not THAT terrible, IMHO. The picture quality is *very* good for a video transfer of 1992. The sound quality is fine too. The set list lacks SOS, TR, TOL and TWL, but I suspect this is so that the product complements rather than compete with Alchemy. And compared to Basel you get the rarely played -and superb- You and Your Friend. Too bad we did not get PONO and IH as well. But by the time they filmed the concerts of Nimes and Rotterdam PONO was already dropped from the set, and IH was not frequent.
What is more debetable is what you expressed by "they suck the life out of it". It is true that OTN was reprocessed in the studio, especially the vocals. This is a complete mindset change compared to Alchemy. Even today Alchemy promotion reemphasize the fact that it is a pure concert "as it is" with no overdubs of any kind. 9 years later, why did the mindset change so much ? I don't know. I believe in MK is now closed to the spirit of Alchemy than this of OTN. Minus the speed, of course...
By the way, who is CI ? I know Chuck Ainlay, but that would be CA...