We cannot introduce video evidence as this would slow down the game. Using it in retrospect would also be a mistake as fans would leave a match without being sure of the result. Madness. Also, there would be no more discussion of the games like we are having now or the fans on the way home!
It's about time Ireland gave up on this handball rubbish and got on with it. France deserved to win the game anyway and still had a chance to defend the cross; Henry never actually scored with his hand.
[/quote]
tut tut,forget about it
su're we had a few pints of guinness & it was gone in a flash
- a bit like Maradonna hand of God in 86 su're you'd never hear about that incident either,nobody ever talks about it
::)BTW, you must have been looking at different games to me coz Ireland were by far the better team over the two legs & I'm not looking through green tinted glasses either
Seriously though,there should be video evidence introduced in soccer,su're you have pre madonnas rolling around the ground with nothing wrong with them already who slow the game up no end & theres nothing wrong with it???Whats the difference with a fourth official who stops to clock for 30 seconds to have a look at an incident which may or may not cost a team a place in the world cup - it only makes sence to me anyway?
Just heard that USA are meeting Algeria in Pretoria @ 3pm & England are meeting France at the airport @ 6
[/quote]
There can be 30 or 40 'incidents' in every game. It would interfere with the flow of the game. The answer is simple - more officials. 4 linesman for starters.
