New DS Live Box Set, 3rd November 2023!

[Robson]

Guy just wrote the expanded On The Night songs were chosen by him and MK didn't even listen to them 

I would be surprised if he had bothered to listen to them. Plus, he really seems to dislike the OES album. One time he didn't even remember My Parties was on OES 

On Every Street is MK's favorite album.

[border_reiver]

I wonder if this new boxset was an idea of MK and JI or the record compagny? And does MK really work on this or does he give Guy a sort of cart blanche??

Mark probably doesn't give a hoot about this. He probably said "yeah, go ahead" and that's it

LOL. He called it.   

[jf9081]

Guy's last reply says that Alchemy has all been remixed...didn't he previously just say the new entries?? I got confused...maybe I didn't understand correctly?

[ds1984]

Logical.

[knopfler1]

I thought he said that OTN as we know it had just been remastered, with new tracks being mixed. Didn’t know if the same applied to Alchemy but seems by the latest reply on the forum he has remixed the full thing?

[jbaent]

Guy's last reply says that Alchemy has all been remixed...didn't he previously just say the new entries?? I got confused...maybe I didn't understand correctly?

Online credits says that previously available tracks are remastered, "industrial" and "twisting" are remixed and remastered and "Portobello" is intro extended, remixed and remastered.

Boom, like that!

Lol

[ds1984]

Online credits are not always reliable

[mschaap]

If Alchemy indeed is remixed entirely, that would be great!
This would be something you’d advertise I suppose, so that’s very strange. But the communication is a mess anyway, so all is possible.
Take for instance the claim for the same tracks to be remixed and remastered, that just seems impossible to me. If you have a new mix, you are going to master that for the very first time and therefore it can’t also be a remaster.

[jbaent]

Online credits are not always reliable

In the streaming services the credits are provided from the record companies so they are as reliable as the info is provided by the official source of the material being sell.

[jbaent]

If Alchemy indeed is remixed entirely, that would be great!
This would be something you’d advertise I suppose, so that’s very strange. But the communication is a mess anyway, so all is possible.
Take for instance the claim for the same tracks to be remixed and remastered, that just seems impossible to me. If you have a new mix, you are going to master that for the very first time and therefore it can’t also be a remaster.

I guess Guy missunderstood the question as in previous ones he laready said he only remixed the new (unreleased) stuff and the previous one was just remastered.

But the truth is the lenght of Alchemy songs doesn't match with the ones released in the original Alchemy record.

And also, the truth is Guy said that he believed that Alchemy was a mix between 22nd and 23rd of July, which is false (it comes from the 23rd in more than a 98%) so if he remixed all Alchemy in it's entirety he would had needed to work with the EXACT tapes of the EXACT dates.

[ds1984]

Online credits are not always reliable

In the streaming services the credits are provided from the record companies so they are as reliable as the info is provided by the official source of the material being sell.

 

[dustyvalentino]

Online credits are not always reliable

In the streaming services the credits are provided from the record companies so they are as reliable as the info is provided by the official source of the material being sell.

 

Yeah, I don't trust the record companies to be reliable!

[quizzaciously]

How about it?

[herlock]

How about it?

I'm worried:
-They interrupted the release of Wembley 85, to release this, which we already have on blu Ray...
-The magnificent synth intro is cut!!

[rmarques821]

How about it?

They cut the fantastic, atmospheric synth intro...