None of this is good news for musicians. Even though it sounds off at the moment, it is bad for the environment to create and is inching its way to replacing human creativity. So I wouldn't click on the link and encourage these people.
I think that are AI Music tools that can make a decent job IF the music is poor enough.
What I mean is that many of nowadays (current generation?) popular music have no complexity at all. And above that, all emotions are deeply fake because the discover of 'the formula'.
When I say popular music I mean every regional style of popular music.
Using my example, I played in a few brazilian popular-style bands. Not big deal, near city concerts, TV shows, travel and very small touring. The music had good arrangements and everytime that a new song came in for rehearsal, we tried an approach that could make us, musicians, happy. In result of that, we could see if the arrangements would work during the concert and the audience reception and etc...
Almost every song had a riff, great groove, bridges, solos... And it was applied to all bands.
Short story (because I talk too much), Some of my friends tells that, sometimes, they are the only players in the studio for recording. The song was done by computer using "the formula"
We all enjoy to do pre-production using Toontrack, Native Instruments, IK, Fruity Loops with decent results for pre-production.
Problem is that, nowadays, the audience could barely distinct (or doesn't care) wich is AI or human.
I went to Rock In Rio Lisbon last year and there was a young singer that did a whole concert alone on stage with 4 dancers. 100% playback with sampled-plugin-made music. And the audience was screaming.
We can discuss it the whole day. It wont change anything because people are too much ansiety to deal with it (or anything)
I ALWAYS say: "The statistic ruined the entertainment"