Back into the Studio very soon

[ds1984]

And I would add this: would any of us be here if the first 6 years of his career never happened?

Well you are on a MK fan forum.

I was a big DS fan and really liked the early solo years that followed.

[Darling Pretty]

Basil is one of the best melodies he has ever written, and that is from his last album. Nuff said.

Basil is a Killer Song

[Shangri-La]

I prefer Mark´s albums than DS too. More greatest songes like Basil, Terminal of Tribute to, Baloney Again, Hill Farmer, 5.15 a.m. etc.

[Stanko]

[quote author=Rail King link=topic=5161.msg115737#msg115737 date=15
Yes, I would. I only discovered MK when "On Every Street" came out, as a kid. And today, I listen to his solo albums more often than to his Dire-Straits records. I wouldn't say they're better or worse, just different – and somehow they seem to appeal to me more the older I get.

The question whether he would have become famous based on his solo stuff alone is a good one - maybe I would still have discovered him (I hope so), or maybe not - but that doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the quality of his music. There's a lot more music being produced these days, and thus you need even more luck to be discovered than you needed in the old days. Oh, and like Noel Gallagher once said: "Just because you sell lots of records it doesn't mean to say you're any good. Look at Phil Collins." 
[/quote]

Good point, my thoughts are exact.

Hi val, my playlists are equal btw (only the fact that there are more solo out now would be the only reason why the solo is more presented on my playlists I guess  )

[tngemini]

Every period delivered their holy grails. For sure, there will be some more ...

[jbaent]

But my point is that MK is famous for what he did with DS. If he had done what he does now in 1977 he never would had achieved the same level.of success.

Is nowadays music is nice but it's not something that would made you achieve the success that DS gained with his records.

Basil won't made them achieve great record deals and world tours. Is a wonderful song, it is, but it's not Sultans of swing or Tunnel of love that are wonderful songs and great rock and roll hits.

[dmg]

But my point is that MK is famous for what he did with DS. If he had done what he does now in 1977 he never would had achieved the same level.of success.

Is nowadays music is nice but it's not something that would made you achieve the success that DS gained with his records.

Basil won't made them achieve great record deals and world tours. Is a wonderful song, it is, but it's not Sultans of swing or Tunnel of love that are wonderful songs and great rock and roll hits.

Exactly.  Worthy though his music is, I doubt he would have got a record deal these days.  Basil is a great song, best on Tracker for me, but every song on the first album was better.  If it wasn't for the name and the established fanbase then what would sales be...

[tngemini]

I am pretty sure that if sultans was written in 2000's, it was ignored ...
Celebrity gives the opportunity to be heard ... and with talent, to go through decades.
Same as the beatles ... The History is written only one time : to be in the right place at the right moment !

[quizzaciously]

I am pretty sure that if sultans was written in 2000's, it was ignored ...
Celebrity gives the opportunity to be heard ... and with talent, to go through decades.
Same as the beatles ... The History is written only one time : to be in the right place at the right moment !

Omg, you read my mind! I was writing about being in the right place at the right moment, haha. MK is the perfect example of that. But of course it wasn't just the pure luck, he worked hard to do it all. And I still think that "Beryl" IS the Sultans of 2010s (just give it another 30 years).

[superval99]

But my point is that MK is famous for what he did with DS. If he had done what he does now in 1977 he never would had achieved the same level.of success.

I do see your point and I agree with you, but that doesn't change the fact that I, personally, enjoy the solo material far more than DS material, with a few exceptions, of course.   As I said previously, my playlist is 95% solo, but more and more I find myself skipping some of the DS songs, unless they are played live, as inthe case of TR and R&J for example.

[jbaent]

Val, that's because we grow old like MK, and our tastes had changed as well, in some cases fasters than others.

People who abandoned MK in his solo career would listen to DS but never MK solo records. People that continued following him and learnt not to expect that DS style songs, but learnt to enjoy the nowadays MK songs, would rather listen to the solo records as they fut better with the MK we keep following that the one from DS which is gone long ago some would say, for good.

[ds1984]

All in all if I had to choose between DS and MK solo - without hesitation it would be DS.

[Stanko]

you would find more people enjoy to Brothers in Arms song of course - while I would think again between, just for an example, After the Beanstalk  you know, "a hen can lay a golden egg but she still can't sing, well the hen's alright but the harp is everything,... well the harp's worth more than any fortune and fame... Brilliant.

[Robson]

After The Beanstalk It's a key to understand better Marka Knopflera.

[Pottel]

All in all if I had to choose between DS and MK solo - without hesitation it would be DS.

Not that easy for me

sent from my Samsung galaxy 7edge via tapatalk